Union 
W-L: (12-22) PR = 94.5641
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
926 H Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 3- 0
927 H Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 2- 0
1003 H Merrimack ( 7-25, 93.5) 4- 2
1004 H Merrimack ( 7-25, 93.5) 2- 2
1010 H New Hampshire (17-16, 95.3) 1- 1
1011 H New Hampshire (17-16, 95.3) 1- 3
1017 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 7- 5
1018 H Wisconsin HA (30- 6, 99.8) 0- 4
1018 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 3- 1
1024 H Clarkson AC (20-11, 96.7) 2- 5
1025 H St. Lawrence AC (12-21, 95.3) 2- 3
1031 A Quinnipiac AC (28- 8, 97.7) 1- 6
1101 A Princeton AC (23-10, 97.1) 2- 5
1107 A RPI AC ( 7-28, 93.6) 1- 2
1108 H RPI AC ( 7-28, 93.6) 7- 4
1121 H Cornell AC (20-12, 96.8) 4- 3
1122 H Colgate AC (19-15, 96.1) 2- 3
1128 H Delaware L ( 2-31, 92.0) 7- 0
1129 H Delaware L ( 2-31, 92.0) 3- 0
1205 A Harvard AC (16-15, 95.8) 2- 4
1206 A Dartmouth AC ( 5-23, 93.9)
102 A Yale AC (25- 9, 97.2) 3- 6
103 A Brown AC (18-15, 96.0) 1- 3
109 H Princeton AC (23-10, 97.1) 1- 3
110 H Quinnipiac AC (28- 8, 97.7) 1- 5
116 A St. Lawrence AC (12-21, 95.3) 2- 5
117 A Clarkson AC (20-11, 96.7) 1- 5
124 A RPI AC ( 7-28, 93.6) 4- 3
130 H Brown AC (18-15, 96.0) 3- 7
131 H Yale AC (25- 9, 97.2) 2- 5
206 A Colgate AC (19-15, 96.1) 1- 2
207 A Cornell AC (20-12, 96.8) 0- 5
213 H Dartmouth AC ( 5-23, 93.9) 1- 0
214 H Harvard AC (16-15, 95.8) 1- 2
220 A Clarkson AC (20-11, 96.7) 2- 1
227 A Yale AC (25- 9, 97.2) 2- 4
228 A Yale AC (25- 9, 97.2) 1- 6
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
926 H Franklin Pierce 3- 0 3 1 + 2.22
927 H Franklin Pierce 2- 0 2 1 1.22
1003 H Merrimack 4- 2 2 1 0.52
1004 H Merrimack 2- 2 0 1 -1.48
1010 H New Hampshire 1- 1 0 0 0.36
1011 H New Hampshire 1- 3 -2 0 -1.64
1017 H Saint Anselm 7- 5 2 1 0.91
1018 H Wisconsin 0- 4 -4 -5 0.85
1018 H Saint Anselm 3- 1 2 1 0.91
1024 H Clarkson 2- 5 -3 -2 -1.26
1025 H St. Lawrence 2- 3 -1 0 -0.67
1031 A Quinnipiac 1- 6 -5 -4 -1.50
1101 A Princeton 2- 5 -3 -3 -0.04
1107 A RPI 1- 2 -1 1 -1.61
1108 H RPI 7- 4 3 1 1.62
1121 H Cornell 4- 3 1 -2 + 2.86
1122 H Colgate 2- 3 -1 -1 0.16
1128 H Delaware 7- 0 7 3 ++ 4.02
1129 H Delaware 3- 0 3 3 0.02
1205 A Harvard 2- 4 -2 -2 -0.36
102 A Yale 3- 6 -3 -3 -0.01
103 A Brown 1- 3 -2 -2 -0.20
109 H Princeton 1- 3 -2 -2 0.19
110 H Quinnipiac 1- 5 -4 -3 -1.27
116 A St. Lawrence 2- 5 -3 -1 -1.90
117 A Clarkson 1- 5 -4 -3 -1.49
124 A RPI 4- 3 1 1 0.39
130 H Brown 3- 7 -4 -1 - -2.97
131 H Yale 2- 5 -3 -2 -0.78
206 A Colgate 1- 2 -1 -2 0.93
207 A Cornell 0- 5 -5 -3 - -2.36
214 H Harvard 1- 2 -1 -1 -0.13
220 A Clarkson 2- 1 1 -3 + 3.51
227 A Yale 2- 4 -2 -3 0.99
228 A Yale 1- 6 -5 -3 - -2.01
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
130 H Brown 3- 7 -4 -1 - -2.97
207 A Cornell 0- 5 -5 -3 - -2.36
228 A Yale 1- 6 -5 -3 - -2.01
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
1128 H Delaware 7- 0 7 3 ++ 4.02
926 H Franklin Pierce 3- 0 3 1 + 2.22
1121 H Cornell 4- 3 1 -2 + 2.86
220 A Clarkson 2- 1 1 -3 + 3.51
|
Union Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
| Delaware |
Union |
Union |
 
| |
| Lindenwood |
Lindenwood |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 3) |
Lindenwood |
| Mercyhurst |
Mercyhurst |
|
Mercyhurst   4- 0 vs 1- 1 |
|
| Penn State |
Penn State |
|
Penn State   4- 0 vs 2- 1 |
|
| RIT |
RIT |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 2) |
RIT |
| Robert Morris |
Union |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) |
Union |
| Syracuse |
Syracuse |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 2) |
Syracuse |
| Brown |
Brown |
Brown |
 
| |
| Clarkson |
Clarkson |
Clarkson |
 
| |
| Colgate |
Colgate |
Colgate |
 
| |
| Cornell |
Cornell |
|
Cornell   5- 3 vs 1- 7 |
|
| Dartmouth |
Union |
Union |
 
| |
| Harvard |
Harvard |
Harvard |
 
| |
| Princeton |
Princeton |
Princeton |
 
| |
| Quinnipiac |
Quinnipiac |
Quinnipiac |
 
| |
| RPI |
Union |
Union |
 
| |
| St. Lawrence |
St. Lawrence |
St. Lawrence |
 
| |
| Yale |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| Boston College |
Boston College |
|
tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) |
Boston College |
| Boston University |
Union |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 1- 2) |
Union |
| Connecticut |
Connecticut |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) |
Connecticut |
| Holy Cross |
Holy Cross |
|
Holy Cross   5- 0 vs 3- 1 |
|
| Maine |
Maine |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 4)( 3- 4) |
Maine |
| Merrimack |
Union |
Union |
 
| |
| New Hampshire |
New Hampshire |
New Hampshire |
 
| |
| Northeastern |
Northeastern |
|
Northeastern   4- 3 vs 2- 4 |
|
| Providence |
Providence |
|
Providence   4- 3 vs 2- 3 |
|
| Vermont |
Vermont |
|
tied - ( 3- 3) ( 3- 2) |
Vermont |
| Assumption |
Union |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 4) |
Union |
| Franklin Pierce |
Union |
Union |
 
| |
| LIU |
Union |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 2) |
Union |
| Post |
Union |
|
Union   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Sacred Heart |
Union |
|
Union   3- 1 vs 1- 3 |
|
| Saint Anselm |
Union |
Union |
 
| |
| St.Michael's |
St.Michael's |
|
 
| St.Michael's |
| Stonehill |
Union |
|
Union   2- 3 vs 0- 3 |
|
| Bemidji State |
Bemidji State |
|
tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) |
Bemidji State |
| Minnesota |
Minnesota |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Minnesota |
| Minnesota Duluth |
Minnesota Duluth |
|
tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) |
Minnesota Duluth |
| Minnesota State |
Minnesota State |
|
tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 1) |
Minnesota State |
| Ohio State |
Ohio State |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Ohio State |
| St. Cloud State |
St. Cloud State |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 1) |
St. Cloud State |
| St. Thomas |
St. Thomas |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
St. Thomas |
| Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
 
| |
PowerWise = 13

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 36.18
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 3- 0 -5.73 2.20 -0.39 1.00 3.64
0 H Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 2- 0 -5.73 2.20 -0.39 1.00 3.64
0 H Merrimack ( 7-25, 93.5) 4- 2 -6.43 1.50 -0.39 1.00 2.24
0 H Merrimack ( 7-25, 93.5) 2- 2 -6.43 1.50 -0.39 1.00 203.43
0 H New Hampshire (17-16, 95.3) 1- 1 -4.59 3.34 -0.39 1.00 203.43
0 H New Hampshire (17-16, 95.3) 1- 3 -4.59 3.34 -0.39 1.00 -2.50
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 7- 5 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 1.00 3.03
0 H Wisconsin (30- 6, 99.8) 0- 4 -0.10 7.83 -0.39 1.00 -0.24
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 3- 1 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 1.00 3.03
0 H Clarkson (20-11, 96.7) 2- 5 -3.21 4.72 -0.39 1.00 -1.81
0 H St. Lawrence (12-21, 95.3) 2- 3 -4.62 3.31 -0.39 1.00 -2.52
0 A Quinnipiac (28- 8, 97.7) 1- 6 -2.22 5.71 0.39 1.00 -0.92
0 A Princeton (23-10, 97.1) 2- 5 -2.76 5.17 0.39 1.00 -1.19
0 A RPI ( 7-28, 93.6) 1- 2 -6.33 1.60 0.39 1.00 -2.99
0 H RPI ( 7-28, 93.6) 7- 4 -6.33 1.60 -0.39 1.00 2.44
0 H Cornell (20-12, 96.8) 4- 3 -3.09 4.85 -0.39 1.00 8.97
0 H Colgate (19-15, 96.1) 2- 3 -3.79 4.14 -0.39 1.00 -2.10
0 H Delaware ( 2-31, 92.0) 7- 0 -7.93 1.00 -0.39 1.00 1.23
0 H Delaware ( 2-31, 92.0) 3- 0 -7.93 1.00 -0.39 1.00 1.23
0 A Harvard (16-15, 95.8) 2- 4 -4.08 3.85 0.39 1.00 -1.86
0 A Yale (25- 9, 97.2) 3- 6 -2.73 5.20 0.39 1.00 -1.18
0 A Brown (18-15, 96.0) 1- 3 -3.92 4.01 0.39 1.00 -1.78
0 H Princeton (23-10, 97.1) 1- 3 -2.76 5.17 -0.39 1.00 -1.58
0 H Quinnipiac (28- 8, 97.7) 1- 5 -2.22 5.71 -0.39 1.00 -1.31
0 A St. Lawrence (12-21, 95.3) 2- 5 -4.62 3.31 0.39 1.00 -2.13
0 A Clarkson (20-11, 96.7) 1- 5 -3.21 4.72 0.39 1.00 -1.42
0 A RPI ( 7-28, 93.6) 4- 3 -6.33 1.60 0.39 1.00 3.99
0 H Brown (18-15, 96.0) 3- 7 -3.92 4.01 -0.39 1.00 -2.16
0 H Yale (25- 9, 97.2) 2- 5 -2.73 5.20 -0.39 1.00 -1.57
0 A Colgate (19-15, 96.1) 1- 2 -3.79 4.14 0.39 1.00 -1.71
0 A Cornell (20-12, 96.8) 0- 5 -3.09 4.85 0.39 1.00 -1.36
0 H Dartmouth ( 5-23, 93.9) 1- 0 -5.98 1.95 -0.39 1.00 3.14
0 H Harvard (16-15, 95.8) 1- 2 -4.08 3.85 -0.39 1.00 -2.24
0 A Clarkson (20-11, 96.7) 2- 1 -3.21 4.72 0.39 1.00 10.27
0 A Yale (25- 9, 97.2) 2- 4 -2.73 5.20 0.39 1.00 -1.18
0 A Yale (25- 9, 97.2) 1- 6 -2.73 5.20 0.39 1.00 -1.18
------
416.81
|
winning pts = 46.8556 losing points = -36.9088
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------